ARE YOUR CHILDREN INHERITING REAL PROPERTY? HOW TO AVOID PROP 13 TAX REASSESSMENT

If you own property and want to transfer it to a family member or leave it to one when you die,
California’s property tax is something to consider. This article will explain how you can plan
for your children to receive California real estate from you without triggering an expensive
property tax reassessment. A little planning can go a long way and save your loved ones
thousands of dollars every year.

California Property Tax

Generally, California real estate is taxed at 1% of the property’s “assessed value.” The assessed
value is the fair market value as of the date of a change in ownership. The law limits increases
to the assessed value to no more than 2% each year. When there is a change in ownership, the
property value is generally reassessed and the new owner pays more property tax. If the value of
your property has increased more than the rate the tax has increased (up to 2% per year), a
reassessment will result in significantly higher property taxes. San Francisco property owners
have the most to save by planning because San Francisco property seems to appreciate more
than property in other parts of California.

If you are selling your property to a stranger, you probably do not care about reassessment. If
you want to transfer your property to your children, however, proper planning can save them
thousands of dollars every year. Here is a simple illustration: say you purchased your home in
1998 for $1,000,000. The original property tax would be $10,000 a year. The amount that is
taxed each year can be increased by up to 2% annually. So the property tax in 1999 would be
no more than $10,200. Assume that you now want to sell the home and it is worth
$10,000,000. The new owner would pay property tax on $10,000,000, which is $100,000 the
first year – far more than what you were paying!

Certain transfers within families are excluded from the general rule that a change in ownership
triggers reassessment. These exclusions include transfers between spouses and domestic
partners. Note that domestic partners won the right to the same property tax breaks as
husbands and wives in 2008 when the California Supreme Court turned down an appeal by
County Assessors. This article focuses primarily on exclusions for the parent to child transfers
and the exclusion for transfers to certain trusts.

Parent to Child Transfers

Generally speaking, a transfer of property from a parent to a child is not subject to
reassessment, so the child will pay the same lower rate the parent paid. There are significant
limitations to this general rule. Each parent may transfer their principal residence and up to
the first $1,000,000 of the full cash value of another property to their child without triggering
a reassessment.

Your principal residence is the property where you would take a homeowner’s exemption –the
place where you actually live, not a rental or vacation property. A transfer of up to 1,000,000 of
the full cash value of another property is where it gets a little more complicated. The “full cash
value” refers to the assessed value, not the fair market value of the property – so you can really
transfer property worth far more than one million dollars without triggering a reassessment. For
example, if you purchased the property thirty years ago for $100,000 and it is now worth well
over $1,000,000, the assessed value ($100,000 plus yearly increases of no more than 2%) is the
amount to be considered, even though the child will receive a property worth well over
$1,000,000.

Since each parent can transfer to the child, one child could theoretically receive two principal
dwellings (although usually there will be only one) and up to $2,000,000 of the full cash value
of other properties. The “Claim for Reassessment Exclusion” form must be filed within three
years of the transferor before the property is transferred to a third party. Failing to file the
appropriate form can result in a reassessment.

Although the concept of “parent and child” seems simple enough, there are some unique
scenarios to consider. In addition to all “natural children,” children born to a parent with a
registered domestic partner, step-children, and those adopted before they reach age 18 are also
eligible for the exclusion. The spouse of a child (son or daughter-in-law) is eligible unless the
relationship ends in divorce. If, however, the relationship ends because your child dies, the
parent-child relationship is deemed to continue with the child-in-law until he or she remarries.
There are also circumstances where foster children and foster parents can
qualify.

Also, a grandparent may take advantage of this exclusion under specific circumstances and
transfer to a grandchild without reassessment. The child’s parents must be deceased before
any grandparents qualify. Further discussion of additional restrictions on grandparent-grandchild
transfers exceed the scope of this article.

Beware of Limited Liability Companies and Other Entities

Many owners transfer their property to an entity such as a limited liability company to protect
their other assets from lawsuits. One downside of doing so is that the property may be
reassessed when the interest in the limited liability company is given to the children by gift or
inheritance. This is because the parent-child exclusion only applies to transfers of real
property, not of interests in an entity. For example, if you transfer your property to a limited
liability company and then transfer at least a majority interest to your child, there will be a
change in ownership and reassessment of the entire property. For property tax purposes it usually
makes more sense to simply transfer the property to the child directly rather than going
through an entity such as an LLC. A discussion of the entity rules is beyond the scope of this
article. Don’t make the costly mistake of holding your real estate in such an entity without
legal advice if you plan to leave your real estate to your children or grandchildren!

If you do not have children, however, transferring your property to an entity may be a good
idea. Most transfers to entities that result in one spouse gaining an ownership interest over the
other do not trigger a reassessment. This is because the inter-spousal exclusion from
reassessment is broader than the parent-child exclusion.

A transfer of real estate to entities that do not result in a change in the beneficial ownership
interest will not trigger the reassessment. These rules can not be fully covered here, so consult a
qualified lawyer before making any transfers to make sure they best suit your situation.

Transfers to Revocable Living Trust

Another way to transfer your property without triggering a reassessment is to transfer it to
your revocable living trust. This option may be used if you are not ready to transfer your
property now and you want to make provisions for it after your death.

For a trust to be revocable, you as trustor must reserve the right to terminate the trust and retain
all trust property. When property is placed in a revocable living trust, there is no “change in
ownership” and thus no reassessment. All that changes upon death when the revocable living
trust becomes irrevocable. Your revocable living trust should contain planning to qualify your
property for the parent-child or another exclusion to avoid a “change in ownership,” and thus
reassessment, upon your death.

Transfers to Irrevocable Trust

When property is transferred to an irrevocable trust during your lifetime or upon your death,
or the beneficiary of such a trust is changed, there has been a change in ownership for
property tax purposes and there will generally be a reassessment.

There will not be reassessment, however, if the parent-child exception applies. With proper
planning, you can leave your property to your child in trust, not have to worry that they will
be burdened with high property taxes, and you can still hold on to the property for the
duration of your life if you so choose.

When property is left to more than one child, one child may want the property and the other
will want money or assets of equal value. If the trust merely provides the property to both
children equally (each getting a one-half interest), one will then have to transfer their interest
to the other in exchange for an equalizing payment. This would no longer be a parent-child
transfer, but would be a sibling-to-sibling transfer, which is not excluded from reassessment.
Thus a change in ownership will have occurred and the property tax will be reassessed.

To avoid this outcome, create a “non-pro rata” trust – one that provides for unequal
distribution of the trust assets. A non-pro rata trust can allow one child to get the property
without triggering reassessment and others to get other trust assets of equal value.

Property transferred by trust and by will is treated differently. The law assumes that the
trustee has the power to distribute trust assets non-pro rata unless the trust instrument
prohibits non-pro rata distributions. With a will, the property will pass to the estate
beneficiaries in equal shares, unless the will specifically grant the executor the power to
make non-pro rata distributions.

Note that if a beneficiary receives a present beneficial use of the property or income from the
property, then it is deemed that there has been a “change in ownership” and the property taxes
will be reassessed. To avoid this, the beneficiary generally should not live on the property or
collect rental income.

Keep in mind that all beneficiaries must qualify for an exception to avoid reassessment. The
the entire property will be reassessed if even one beneficiary does not qualify!

There are many more nuances in the law that we have not mentioned. These are just some of
the ways you can plan to avoid reassessment. Discuss these ideas with your estate planning
attorney if you want to transfer real estate to your loved ones without reassessment.

2018-07-20T13:08:32+00:00
Translate »